News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by zozbot234 on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @04:38PM (#31673706)
It might be quite obvious that memorization is convenient, but 'required' means "you can't do it any other way" and that's obviously incorrect.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by westurner on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @04:50PM (#31673906)
IDK why we'd assume that there's a different cognitive process for learning mathematics with radix 10 than with radix 16?

Mathematics_education#Methods https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics_education#Methods :

> [...] Rote learning: the teaching of mathematical results, definitions and concepts by repetition and memorisation typically without meaning or supported by mathematical reasoning. A derisory term is drill and kill. In traditional education, rote learning is used to teach multiplication tables, definitions, formulas, and other aspects of mathematics.

Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by kaba0 on Thursday June 09, 2022 @03:50AM (#31678619)
I think they mean that it is very useful to “cache” these primitive results, but it is absolutely possible to regenerate them if one is missing or the like.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by Viliam1234 on Saturday June 11, 2022 @06:57PM (#31709291)
It should be understood first, and memorized later.

If you do not memorize small things that you frequently need, it will slow you down.

But if keep memorizing things without understanding, at some moment your memory will return an incorrect result, and you will be unable to notice it.