The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by chucksta on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:27PM (#31670877)

So you can't have a high IQ and not be in gifted?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by 0des on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:41PM (#31671160)

any time you feel your hands touch your hips, and your sentence begins to start with the word "so", just stop what youre doing and go have a snickers.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by chucksta on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @03:54PM (#31673100)

At least my post is relevant to the topic, not just critiquing someone for being hangry

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by 0des on Thursday June 09, 2022 @10:57AM (#31681996)

how are your hands both simultaneously on your hips and the keyboard at the same time?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by chucksta on Monday June 13, 2022 @04:08PM (#31731091)

Zing! keep em coming!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by rhexs on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:32PM (#31670981)

What?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by chucksta on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @03:57PM (#31673135)

You changed the subject from being in gifted to being gifted. You can exist outside of gifted and still have a high IQ and be a successful person. So, no.

[ Parent | on HN ]