Did you just spend lots of time debating me without even taking the 10 minutes necessary to read the article?

Wow. This tells a lot about the quality of this discussion.

Read the reuters article that was linked. It's all in there.

I'm done debating with you, this is just a waste of time.

I read both articles but I went back to re-read them, as I'm willing to be proven wrong. Neither mention anything about polyamorous marriage, and definitely nothing about 54% support for it. They mention traditional (2-person) same-sex and cis marriages.