News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elon Musk asserts his “right to terminate” Twitter deal by snowwrestler on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @07:15AM (#31652469)
It’s not to save the inspection fee, it’s to win a bidding war on the house. Given two bids at the same price, sellers will accept the bid with fewer contingencies.

This is also why people offered all cash for a house even when mortgages were cheap (avoids the financing contingency).

Re:Elon Musk asserts his “right to terminate” Twitter deal by falcolas on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @11:13AM (#31655562)
Not worth it. Spending $200k (I know, I'm a good decade out of date on my house prices) on a house and then having to spend another $200k to make it habitable is a losing game.

Perhaps it's different if you're acting like an angel investor in housing, but for an average family, it's financial Russian Roulette.

Re:Elon Musk asserts his “right to terminate” Twitter deal by anotherman554 on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @11:42AM (#31655987)
We're getting off topic, but I have two points about waiving inspection:

1) In my state there's a mandatory seller disclosure. If the seller knew about a problem with the house and didn't disclose it on the seller disclosure you can sue them if you can prove they new about the defect and intentionally didn't disclose it, so there's at least that.

2) Home inspectors don't take legal responsibility if the inspection misses something important, they only offer to, at most, give you your money back on the inspection. So you have to be optimistic that the inspector has a clue what they are doing and can catch future problems when you rely on an inspection.

Buying a home while waiving inspection might be Russian Roulette, but I bet the odds are less than 16.7% that waiving inspection will financially kill you.