I don't think zero-sum adversarial X vs Y thinking is helpful. Both of these have value. As a developer, it sounds like accessibility already worked, and that the benefit to the accessibilities-using features is speed, which is good, but likely not groundbreaking. But I also would like some of the many features of the web to be unlocked by this slow-to-implement browser, and SharedWorkers is over a decade old & sits in an important & unique spot. Trying to play favorites isn't in my interest, but recognizing the values of each I think is informative.
> pretending that whateverworkers are a thing that is usable beyond very few convoluted examples
If you don't even know what the thing is you probably aren't qualified to judge. You don't seem to be interested in learning or informing; you seem to be trying to score points, & doing so by mockery & cruelty. I hope we can find better manners, more appropriate for good, learned, engaged Hackers, than this.
The "obsession" is with having a good common platform for development. Powered by some of the fastest rendering engines on the planet, some of the fastest language runtimes out there. With an unbelievably joyous continuous development brought about by fantastic live tools. For over a decade, with ongoing & continuous & highly visible improvement.
It's disgraceful what sad moaning & endless disdain people who like working here have to suffer, how berated we get for seeing potential & chasing it. Getting insulted & slandered is so common, this is so typical, so regular; endless dogpiles by the haters, and it's so cheap, such an expression of negativity & bias & cruelty.
I never enjoyed writing Win32 or .NET. I never enjoyed writing Qt. I never enjoyed writing FLTK nor GTK. These systems did not spark joy. The native platforms always felt crap, were so much ceremony & encumbrance, and so controlled & crufty & verbose to work with. On the web, I had a live canvas of hypertext, with rich information, ready to go, with a couple lines of HTML. And then I could sprinkle in programmability, add some JavaScript & start to move & shake things. This was an endlessly rewarding loop, was pure joy. The web is joyful. It keeps bringing better & better capabilities, more and more joy. People can go play with WebMIDI now, we can work with Gamepads, or magnenometers or accelerometers. This is fun, this is amazing. It works on all devices (some iOS exceptions may apply).
> the associated inferiority complex,
News-flash: the web won. It's creaming everything else. It's where jobs & development are done today, the default-go-to. It's just better. Webapps like VSCode run stupid fast & do everything better than native did, and because they're built on JS & the web they have sick sick sickeningly awesome plugins that were fast & easy to build.
It's a tragedy that there's so many grumpy hurt feeling abound, around this great & good rise, that such a wonderful fantastic capable & competent system has so many cranky sad mopey feelings. If there's anyone that feels an inferiority complex, it's definitely native people. They will not simmer down & chill the frak out with their endless bemoaning & whining & belittling of the web. The web is constantly endlessly dragged on, shat on, in thread after thread after thread, by people acting high & mighty & telling us, effectively, how dare we? I didn't give you permission to be awesome! My skills are the only ones that count! What you do isn't right!
So again,
> the desktop experience,
This is a relic, ancient dust to us. Our medium is networked by default, can be reached instantly via any device. We have rich servers providing powerful capabilities behind our thick-client user interfaces. Network architectures & information design underpin & shape our implementation decisions, are considered as we model & extend. The word API? It basically means "web interface" more than it means "native library interface" for most people now- because the web is awesome, because what we do is visible & engageable & more a part of the world & active than any lonely, isolated, compiled-down desktop app ever can be.
That we happen to also have buttons & click on things doesn't make us the same.
I will try to insult your platform a little less in the future. But please ya'll, you too need to show a modicum of respect. Having nothing but degrading insults for the web is small, it's out of touch, and the complaining is seemingly bottomless: here ya'll are, in a submission about the web, once again complaining that it's advancing.
Nothing in this sentence applies to web browsers. The rendering in browsers is abysmally slow and extremely inefficient due to the way DOM is structured and rendered on-screen.
> Webapps like VSCode run stupid fast
Sure, if you're a trillion-dollar corporation with thousands of man-hours dedicated to a single app, then sure, you can have a decent app. However, the whole story of VS Code is the story of fighting against its browser origins. You could, for example, read up on how they tried to make the terminal in VS Code fast.
> This is a relic, ancient dust to us.
You do not have the right to talk for all of "us".
But now that it’s in Apple’s financial interests (not even its users’ interests) to push for native apps so Apple can collect their tax, the Apple supporters have seamlessly switched sides.
Good try at subtle insult, but it missed the mark.
Yes, the web had some promise many years ago. Now it's a monstrosity fuelled by Chrome non-standards that's one step away from collapsing under its own weight.
Cases in point: https://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2021/08/breaking_th... and https://toot.cafe/@nolan/106715828929897555 and https://drewdevault.com/2020/03/18/Reckless-limitless-scope....
sliced bread is disaster
That's it.
Sure, users benefit from rich apps. The web isn't a suitable platform for rich apps and will hardly ever be.
The web is the best standardized, cross platform, multi-runtime app platform we have.
This is a magnitudes more important improvement and pushing the web forward than pretending that whateverworkers are a thing that is usable beyond very few convoluted examples (even if those examples end up running in production somewhere)