Re:Python 3.11 Performance Benchmarks Are Looking Fantastic
by dekhn on Monday June 06, 2022 @12:58PM
(#31642906)
I agree 100% (I come from a "use all the cores with threads and shared memory to get linear speedups on many workloads" world). But I think at this point the python leadership has committed to the "every time the GIL-removal looks plausible, find some more single-core speedups to stave off the change". Put another way: I've given up on the hope that python will ever multicore the way I think it should multicore.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Python 3.11 Performance Benchmarks Are Looking Fantastic
by throwaway894345 on Monday June 06, 2022 @01:42PM
(#31643409)
I'd be tickled if Python would singlecore the way I think it should singlecore. Unfortunately, it remains considerably slower even than JavaScript (never mind Go, Java, etc). A lot of bad choices that can't easily be undone without breaking compatibility for a handful of packages, and the Python leadership seems unable or unwilling to guide the community through those changes.