Re:Confess your love with zero-knowledge
by puffoflogic on Friday June 03, 2022 @05:54PM
(#31614162)
As the sibling comment says, neither gp comment nor this post are zero-knowledge.
But in addition to the definition given in sibling comment, here's another necessary condition of a zero-knowledge proof: it must be possible to forge transcripts (i.e., one party writing both sides of the interaction) of a zk proof even without possessing the secret.
But in addition to the definition given in sibling comment, here's another necessary condition of a zero-knowledge proof: it must be possible to forge transcripts (i.e., one party writing both sides of the interaction) of a zk proof even without possessing the secret.