Per the comment from mutedpossibly below, their own ethics board has already shot this down (pun intended), but before that, I wonder how they though any of this would fly under Part 107 [1] (pun also intended).

[1] https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-F...

Not according to their own ethics board: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/03/taser-firm-axo...

Thanks for adding this!

You're welcome and thanks for the thanks! I had just read theguardian article when I came upon your post - usually I just lurk here :)

The violence has escalated.