Re:Microsoft Purview: Additional classifiers for Communicati...
by bufferoverflow on Thursday June 02, 2022 @08:54PM
(#31602782)
> You went from:
>
> > What's not trust worthy exactly?
>
> to:
>
> > Their code, their decisions.
Two separate comments addressing two different points. One doesn't follow from the other. Stop arguing in such dishonest manner.
> What's not trust worthy exactly?
to:
> Their code, their decisions.
It's okay to be a fanboy! Evangelism is needed for any great product/company/ideology. But on HN you'll get typically called out for disingenuous or bad-faith lines of rhetoric.
The person above gave you a perfectly reasonable answer to your original question of "What about Signal is not trustworthy?". It'd be kind to acknowledge that they at least have a single iota of merit.