It gives them an incentive to pay me as quickly as possible.
There is no "earn"out, but we do need to provide them with some support - but we get to charge whatever we want for this (they pass the cost on to their customers). We certainly don't have to work full-time for them, and they know we can do this (we all have other gigs).
Why don't you to ask them to borrow $5M, pay you that amount now, then let them pay off the loan over 3 years? At 12.5% interest, total payments come to about $6M for a 3 year loan term.
It's a way of shifting risk from you to them. Somehow, I doubt they'll agree; but their response may be very informative and helpful for further negotiation.
Because this will be a new product for them, they expect it will take several months before they start to make any revenue with it.
> Why such an extreme discount? I'd start digging there.
Yeah, it seems like a big jump. I asked if it could be monthly pro-rata and they agreed to that.
> Is their business viable for 3 years?
I think so, or they'll get acquired.
> Why don't you to ask them to borrow $5M, pay you that amount now, then let them pay off the loan over 3 years? At 12.5% interest, total payments come to about $6M for a 3 year loan term.
Because they don't know that they'll be able to sell the product that they'll be building around my product. This way if they can't they can cut their losses without being on the hook for the entire amount.
I don't see that I'm taking much of a risk, if they terminate the agreement we get to keep whatever we've been paid to-date.
The options this deal gives them make it extremely profitable to seek outside investors to lend them 2 million for a few years.
I know it's depressing to hear but you really need to think about it and do some financial research on the company. Get legal advice. Don't be forced into signing anything just because the company is "short on time". Remember they want YOUR product. If they want it bad enough they'll stick around for a few weeks. Hell they may even offer more money.
Best of luck!
$2M to $6M is a dramatic difference. It's plausible to say that they're trying to do a deal that sounds like $6M but is, in reality, $2M.
The "can't pay $2M in a year" but "can pay $6M in 3 years" seems a bit dodgy. Is it wholly dependent on the success of your product?
Do you have to work for the company as part of the deal? If you have to "earn" your earnout, the salary numbers have to make sense too.