News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Make Your Own Chips for Free by Matthias247 on Sunday May 29, 2022 @03:40PM (#31552192)
Do FPGAs not already fulfill this purpose very well? I did 3 FPGA projects (custom networking peripheral, some radar related things) during my inversity time using VHDL and really enjoyed them (apart from the slow synthesis time).

Real chips would certainly provide more room, possibilities and performance - but would also take away from the fast turnaround time that FPGAs provide. And given this run only seems to give people a single shot to get the design right - you want to verify it on a FPGA upfront anyway.

Re:Make Your Own Chips for Free by malf on Sunday May 29, 2022 @04:32PM (#31552620)
Is there any situation where you wouldn’t try to verify on an FPGA first?
Re:Make Your Own Chips for Free by FastEatSlow on Sunday May 29, 2022 @07:09PM (#31553777)
If a design includes many analog components then it is effectively required to fab a prototype. Analog simulation is very imperfect, and the analog equivalent of an FPGA, Field-Programmable Analog Array (FPAA), are very limited in resources. [1]

[1] https://www.digikey.co.uk/en/blog/whatever-happened-to-progr...

Re:Make Your Own Chips for Free by throwawaymaths on Sunday May 29, 2022 @04:38PM (#31552676)
Too big to fit on an FPGA that you can afford.
Re:Make Your Own Chips for Free by klyrs on Sunday May 29, 2022 @09:21PM (#31554590)
There are actually cloud FPGA offerings nowadays! They're downright affordable compared to retail price for the monster chips they're sporting.
Re:Make Your Own Chips for Free by Sirened on Sunday May 29, 2022 @10:55PM (#31555074)
You can also do stuff like slicing your design and putting it on multiple FPGAs. Industry has been doing this for ages because there's no way in hell they're going to fit a full SoC on a single FPGA no matter how much money they can throw at that problem.