Re:Qantas ferried an engine on the wing of a 747 (2016)
by bobthepanda on Monday May 30, 2022 @11:30AM
(#31560064)
Also, that happened to be right around the end of their lifespans anyways, and no one wanted to invest in a second generation plane.
Re:Qantas ferried an engine on the wing of a 747 (2016)
by Deritiod on Sunday May 29, 2022 @01:53PM
(#31551142)
It was a novelty. The market was small the expectation that it costly but still profitable is easy.
But I wouldn't care for sonic travel besides the novelty.
Price wins
Re:Qantas ferried an engine on the wing of a 747 (2016)
by retcon on Monday May 30, 2022 @12:39AM
(#31555531)
Admittedly for a unique minority Concorde wasn't a novelty at all: the very few journalists who covered Washington and London global political developments (and who were indulged the budget) used Concorde more often than any red eye shuttle. I actually associate the atrocious decline in public US - UK understanding to this absurdity. The absurdity being how much we needed a humanist perspective on transatlantic relations after 9/11 but got informationally waterboarded instead by sheer volume of grade school quality wire release. The cost of running Speed Bird even a little longer for diplomatic corps reporting should have been a mutual national priority.
They weren't, the Concordes were quite profitable until 9/11 and the following slump in international travel ( due to fear, increased controls and inconveniences) and increase in oil prices.
> I'm surprised there aren't supersonic business jet though
There are companies trying to build supersonic business jets, like Boom.