News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Study HN: Linear Algebra 1, fortnight 2 by gruseom on Tuesday October 25, 2011 @01:36PM (#3154977)
It's been a few days. Anybody care to report where you are? I'm happy to say I'm still doing all the exercises, not so happy to say I've only just finished the ones for 1.4. I thought exercises 29, 52, and 54 were interesting, among others.

Finding time continues to be an issue, but actually working through the material is fine. Many of the exercises are rather fun, as they mostly have some non-mechanical twist. Occasionally (as in 1.4.23) Strang's informality goes a little too far and I have no idea what he's asking.

Re:Study HN: Linear Algebra 1, fortnight 2 by tptacek on Tuesday October 25, 2011 @03:04PM (#3155393)
I'm just starting 1.4. I agree with you about the informality (and also general terseness) but it's something I assume I'm going to acclimate myself to.
Re:Study HN: Linear Algebra 1, fortnight 2 by mechanical_fish on Sunday October 30, 2011 @07:20PM (#3175695)
Trying to catch up; just starting the exercises to 1.4.

Keep going and I'll catch up someday!

Re:Study HN: Linear Algebra 1, fortnight 2 by gruseom on Monday October 31, 2011 @01:54AM (#3176525)
I'm going to be offline for a few days this week, and might not be able to work on exercises. Will post when back. Keep going you guys!
Re:Study HN: Linear Algebra 1, fortnight 2 by gruseom on Thursday November 10, 2011 @11:41AM (#3220698)
I'm back and will get back into the exercises and post as soon as I can. What's others' status?
Re:Study HN: Linear Algebra 1, fortnight 2 by gruseom on Tuesday November 15, 2011 @01:34AM (#3237286)
I have found 1.5 harder to follow, but pretty interesting once you figure it out. The heart of it is the proof (if you can call it that!) of A = LU on pp. 34-35. It is quite beautiful - just one simple idea. But I have a question. From p. 35:

  Both sides of (7) end up equal to the same matrix U,
  and the steps to get there are all reversible.
What is the importance of "and the steps to get there are all reversible"? I don't see how the argument uses this fact.

(On a practical note, I suppose a new thread is in order as we can no longer post top-level comments on this one. If no one else creates one, I'll do so after I've worked through the exercises in 1.5.)

Re:Study HN: Linear Algebra 1, fortnight 2 by gruseom on Thursday November 24, 2011 @11:54AM (#3274799)
The answer to my question is that the proof derives an identity, so you need to reverse the steps to get back from there.