Re:The use of ‘class’ for things that should be simple free ...
by wruza on Sunday May 29, 2022 @05:59AM
(#31547906)
Part of this problem is underconstrained requirements. If you do not specify that “a” can’t be zero in “ax2”, it’s reasonable to behave sensibly in that case. One thing is a free designer who states requirements and constraints. Another is an implementer who was given an isolated task and no more details. You have to be either full-defensive or renegotiate edge cases which probably could lead to unnecessary complexity.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.