The scrum is rarely a productive meeting, it is more of an outlet for the extroverts of the team to talk.
As an introvert, this tires me.
Often the people in question don't even take breaks themselves. I wish they would take their break to have that small talk so I could keep my break for a better time.
This seems generalized to all teams I've worked in across several companies.
Afterwards there are usually meetings about issues raised in the standup or just others or just back to what we were doing.
Standups shouldn't be stressful and if they are it's a bad sign of the way the team is working. We should be able to say what's going on without feeling we'll get jumped on for it.
You mean the daily standup?
Scrum is a full process. There's no "after", no "before". It's a steady state.
(Anyway, I need to decompress almost all meetings I have, of any kind.)
The agile manifesto is just about trying to add value through work, iterating on smaller chunks of work, iterating on your ways of working, semi-regularly spending some time with the team reviewing how things are working out, and adapt accordingly.
Scrum on the other hand is a framework of meetings, roles, rule, and a common language that help heavily process oriented companies/people dip their toes in. A first step if you will, then you iterate to make it your own. Unfortunately, some people "swallow the manual" and take it far too inflexibly. Or deity forbid some business transformation consultancy sells your upper-management the Scaled Agile Framework and its time to polish off the old CV.
So depending on where the particular project lies on a scale of understanding between those two: any and all of the above. Standup is not meant to be stressful, it's just meant to be a forum to raise issues, but some people insist on pulling teeth.
I am most productive before the stand up. The stand up really burns my energy.
After scrum, do you:
1. Immediately get to work
2. Spend time going through recent communications
3. Walk away from the keyboard to decompress
?