Re:Assault by GC
by dpark on Monday October 24, 2011 @06:00PM
(#3151809)
> My point (poorly worded, upon rereading, but I didn't have much time, dayjob and all...) was that the potential advantage of record-major does NOT increase beyond what is packed into one cache line -- so it is a small constant, rather than deserving of O() notation.
I see what you mean, now. You're right that it's a constant multiplier.
I see what you mean, now. You're right that it's a constant multiplier.