Re:Security Vulnerability in Tor Browser
by lucb1e on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @05:37PM
(#31510926)
"Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html (Not sure a rhetorical question to make some vague accusation counts as a substantive comment)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
It's not a "vague accusation", onion routing was developed by the US Naval Research Academy ("NRL", a 3 letter government agency).
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(network)#History for more detail.
The vague accusation is that because "onion routing"[1] has roots in the military, it must have a backdoor that we haven't uncovered in decades. If the person had posted this Wikipedia link with the info you mentioned, for example, I wouldn't have thought it unsubstantial per the guidelines (even if the claim/accusation itself is unsubstantiated by the evidence, that's a difference of opinion and not a guidelines thing).
[1] Not the cryptography, not even the code implementation, but just the general concept: having a message packed in several layers of encryption such that intermediate routers don't know the contents. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onion_routing
Re:Security Vulnerability in Tor Browser
by wolverine876 on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:50PM
(#31514272)
The entire Internet has its roots in the US military, as does ASCII.