News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google has been DDoSing Sourcehut for over a year. Parent comment

Re:Google has been DDoSing Sourcehut for over a year by cycomanic on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @05:00PM (#31510479)
> Disclosure: I was on the Go team at Google until earlier this month. Dealing with DeVault's bad faith arguments is one of the few things I won't miss of that job.

So does or does not the problem persist? Second was or was he not banned from the commenting issue tracker. Third does the CoC require that a person gets notified by the moderator and was DeVault notified?

If the answers are yes to all those problems I wonder who is makeing bad faith arguments?

Note: I have absolutely no skin in this game, except for being a sway and gmail user.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google has been DDoSing Sourcehut for over a year by tptacek on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @06:25PM (#31511502)
The subthread we're commenting on is about the ban, not about the proxy.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google has been DDoSing Sourcehut for over a year by cycomanic on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @09:08PM (#31513033)
The OP specifically said:

> Dealing with DeVault's bad faith arguments is one of the few things I won't miss of that job.

They didn't say bad faith argument about banning, they said argument_s_. So he is not just talking about a single one. Which are the bad faith arguments? I asked if any of the things were not true, nobody said they were untrue. How can any of the arguments (I did not just talk about the proxy, I also talked about the banning) be bad faith if they are true?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google has been DDoSing Sourcehut for over a year by joshuamorton on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:05PM (#31513924)
The bad faith arguments being referred to are ones made on the issuetracker, not in the article.
[ Parent | on HN ]