News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Economics of Bike Lanes by mturmon on Monday October 24, 2011 @01:23PM (#3150575)
It turns out, lots of people have this very same "little thing" to get off their chest. Every discussion of urban cycling goes off on this particular tangent. It's tiresome.

If you talk to people who cycle in cities, you'll find a lot of anger and rage at drivers also. These people may be eccentric, but their opinion seems based on facts as well. So consider the other side.

As a further catalyst, I challenge you, as a driver, to start looking at other drivers (including perhaps yourself) and noting the violations, especially speed limit violations.

For instance, it's a fact that on my way up to work, every driver (including me) is breaking the speed limit (65 in a 60). Almost without exception, every day. On a street near where I live, it's very common to see people driving 40 in a 35 (not including me).

Where's the outrage at these drivers?

Re:The Economics of Bike Lanes by defen on Monday October 24, 2011 @01:47PM (#3150685)
My perspective - I live in San Francisco and have neither a car nor a bike, so I don't think I'm biased.

I think part of the problem is that most urban pedestrians have fully internalized the threat model of bad drivers. Look both ways before crossing the street, don't assume that the driver sees you, cars are generally found on the roads, etc. On the other hand, we haven't fully internalized the threat model of bad bikers. Sometimes they're on the sidewalk, sometimes they're blowing through stop signs alongside a stopped car (so the average pedestrian thinks it's safe because the only thing that could hit him is stopped at the intersection). So bad bikers are more noticeable (to me at least) because I've never had a close call with a bad driver while walking. But both the biker things I described were near-collisions that have happened to me.

Re:The Economics of Bike Lanes by kgermino on Monday October 24, 2011 @02:31PM (#3150891)
Where do you live that people go 65 in a 60?

Where I'm from (Chicago/ Milwaukee) you're lucky if traffic's only going 70 in a 50/55.

Re:The Economics of Bike Lanes by epochwolf on Monday October 24, 2011 @07:49PM (#3152132)
> Where do you live that people go 65 in a 60?

Seattle is like this in a few spots.

> Where I'm from (Chicago/ Milwaukee) you're lucky if traffic's only going 70 in a 50/55.

I grew up in Green Bay, WI. I know exactly what you're thinking. :)

Re:The Economics of Bike Lanes by randallsquared on Monday October 24, 2011 @01:40PM (#3150656)
Where's the outrage at these drivers?

Is there a contingent of bikers somewhere angry at drivers doing 65 in a 60? If not, what does it have to do with anything? The violations that people get upset about are those that actively endanger or inconvenience them or people like them.

Re:The Economics of Bike Lanes by msellout on Monday October 24, 2011 @01:51PM (#3150705)
I am a biker that is angry at drivers doing 65 in a 60. It's bad for gas mileage (and thus hurts me indirectly through climate change and trade deficits), it's bad for safety (and thus hurts me indirectly through costs of government service personnel and road repairs), and it promotes an attitude of automobile entitlement that hinders my safe cycling.
Re:The Economics of Bike Lanes by randallsquared on Monday October 24, 2011 @03:14PM (#3151074)
I am a biker that is angry at drivers doing 65 in a 60.

I'm not sure what your anger has to do with doing 65 in a 60 -- it seems like you might be angry at drivers, full stop. :)

Re:The Economics of Bike Lanes by mturmon on Monday October 24, 2011 @04:56PM (#3151539)
My point is simply that people haul out the "cyclists don't stop at stop signs" argument, in a selective way, without applying it to all traffic rules that are targeted at safety.

You're right, the "65 in a 60" was a rhetorical device. I used it, of course, because it's a law that so many people break.

But seriously, rhetorical devices aside: speeding in residential districts is a real problem for pedestrian (and driver, and cyclist) safety. And I think that's pretty clear.

Why don't we talk about how consistently cyclists obey posted speed limits? ;-)

Re:The Economics of Bike Lanes by Jun8 on Monday October 24, 2011 @01:29PM (#3150604)
Note that my comment was not for drivers vs. bikers but rather bikers vs. pedestrians.