News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safet... by anonymousab on Sunday May 22, 2022 @11:35AM (#31469278)
> but data shows that more accidents and injuries occur with helmets than without.

This demands proof, citation, and of course, controlling for how many cyclists in an area wear helmets vs. not.

Re:Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safet... by Swizec on Sunday May 22, 2022 @11:42AM (#31469357)
Same statistic for motorcycles. You are more likely to be injured in a crash if you wear a helmet.

Because otherwise you go in the dead column.

Re:Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safet... by 41b696ef1113 on Sunday May 22, 2022 @12:43PM (#31470097)
Similar story for helmets during WW1. Prior to metal helmets, soldiers wore cloth caps. After the soldiers started wearing helmets, the number of head injuries climbed rapidly. The alternative, of course is that the soldier would otherwise have been dead.
Re:Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safet... by pessimizer on Sunday May 22, 2022 @12:18PM (#31469767)
You shouldn't follow up a source request with another unsourced fact, but let me follow up with yet another: the statistic are entirely different for motorcycles because motorcyclists are far more likely to have the type of accidents that helmets protect from.

Comparing the fatality rate of bicycling to the one for riding a motorcycle is not good.

edit: That's not only a claim that bicycle helmets vastly reduce the fatality of bicycle accidents (rather than just significantly reduce them), but a claim that so many unhelmeted riders die from bicycle accidents that it distorts safety figures. All of this without any safety figures.