Re:Math on GitHub: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
by Beldin on Saturday May 21, 2022 @12:36PM
(#31459341)
I had the same feeling for a different reason: I don't think this reduces friction enough compared to sharing LaTeX files (on github or overleaf), which we can already do. So I don't think this will usher in a new era.
I realise this could very well become the next "dropbox comment" - and I'll be happy to be proven wrong.
Re:Math on GitHub: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
by patrick451 on Saturday May 21, 2022 @12:56PM
(#31459548)
It would be cool if they would just render entire latex manuscripts that are part of the repo. It sort of sucks that you need to duplicate what you wrote a paper submission into markdown to get github to render it.
Re:Math on GitHub: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
by disgruntledphd2 on Sunday May 22, 2022 @09:46AM
(#31468133)
They do this for org mode files, but that's a much simpler format than LaTeX.
Re:Math on GitHub: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
by nschloe on Sunday May 22, 2022 @07:28AM
(#31466992)
Author here.
You're right, the big dreams always turn out smaller in real life when they come true, right? I'm hoping that the popularity of GitHub will aid a shift of publication style though. :)
I'm skeptical of this take. Gitlab has had math rendering support for quite a while now, so this is hardly novel and doesn't seem to have resulted in the utopia the author is hoping for.