Town Seized Building, Offered to Return It If Owners Bought Two Cars for Police

Re:Town Seized Building, Offered to Return It If Owners Boug... by vkou on Friday May 20, 2022 @05:57PM (#31453025)

> While your three options are the three practical options, one should note that it's not trivial to move to whatever country you might want, and not just because of costs.

It's also not trivial (Next to impossible, actually) to survive alone, completely independent of society.

If you want the benefits of society, you have to abide by its rules.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Town Seized Building, Offered to Return It If Owners Boug... by necovek on Friday May 20, 2022 @11:30PM (#31455024)

Oh, I am not disagreeing with that (though I am sure it is possible in a remote area without roads or any other society-provided infrastructure).

I still think it's good that all norms are being challenged even if it's often times hypocritical or selfish.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Town Seized Building, Offered to Return It If Owners Boug... by landemva on Friday May 20, 2022 @10:39PM (#31454813)

And how do we keep government employees honest when the courts uphold government immunity? In the present topic of Michigan town extortion, how will the government employees be financially and criminally punished?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Town Seized Building, Offered to Return It If Owners Boug... by vkou on Friday May 20, 2022 @11:22PM (#31454988)

By engaging in government. You know, voting, protesting, primaries, lobbying, running for office, propagandizing, working with organizations who do all those things, etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]