Re:Something is wrong in the state of QED - history of physics
by nabla9 on Thursday May 19, 2022 @04:22AM
(#31432057)
Crank science is easy to separate from non-mainstream approaches. Crank science is "everybody is selling nobody is buying" business. There are no physicists inside *or* outside mainstream who buy Consa's crank theories.
(I explained why the narrative is not valid in another comment).
Re:Something is wrong in the state of QED - history of physics
by eln1 on Thursday May 19, 2022 @06:39AM
(#31432826)
One can get grants in physics nearly only if being mainstream ...
Consa brings concrete arguments regarding g-factor, I still haven't seen any concrete explanation, only saying that it is fringe science because of criticism of mainstream ... but he quotes mainstream papers.
https://phys.org/news/2022-05-standard-particle-physics-brok...
The paper claims there are problems already with g-factor, could anybody explain why its objections are not valid?