News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Unfinished Business with Postgres by gjvc on Thursday May 19, 2022 @02:35AM (#31431415)
it wasn't clarification; it was repetition
Re:Unfinished Business with Postgres by hombre_fatal on Thursday May 19, 2022 @03:10AM (#31431613)
No, the comment did make it sound like it was PG’s resilience that saved the data. In fact that seems to be the whole point of the comment.

So the snark does seem out of place and the clarification useful.

Re:Unfinished Business with Postgres by gjvc on Thursday May 19, 2022 @03:32AM (#31431785)
nice bit of white-knighting there
Re:Unfinished Business with Postgres by lelanthran on Thursday May 19, 2022 @04:23AM (#31432060)
> nice bit of white-knighting there

Is it really constructive to throw insults[1]? I explained myself above, after all.

[1] I had to look it up to see what it means: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_knight. Since we aren't in a business context, I can only assume that you think I am female :-)