Re:Formalizing a Proof of God by Leibniz
by gaganyaan on Saturday May 14, 2022 @11:22PM
(#31384990)
Ah right. I missed the fact that you mentioned Feser. I examined the argument first, but shouldn't have bothered since you mentioned him. I've read his blog, and it's chock full of the bizarre reasoning such as above.
> <lots of words>
> A implies B without a single shred of justification
> <some more words>
> Therefore Jesus
I'd recommend not bothering with any of that. It's honestly not worth anybody's time except as a curio for how to dress up nonsense to look reasonable.
> <lots of words>
> A implies B without a single shred of justification
> <some more words>
> Therefore Jesus
I'd recommend not bothering with any of that. It's honestly not worth anybody's time except as a curio for how to dress up nonsense to look reasonable.