Re:Safer Enums in Go
by Strum355 on Saturday May 14, 2022 @10:30AM
(#31378263)
Not going to link it anywhere? I have some doubts given how widely it wouldve been shared if the claim is actually true, and your not linking of an example kinda just furthers that
[ Parent
| on HN ]
That code appears to be using reflection to build up runtime tables?
https://github.com/qlova/tech/blob/c6379c9c32e5b7b2973bc02ba...
https://github.com/qlova/tech/blob/c6379c9c32e5b7b2973bc02ba...
That's a big difference from other languages where this is all handled at compile time.
This is cool, but it doesn't seem like Switch is implemented for Int, and the use of runtime reflection limits the contexts in which this implementation can be used, compared to a language construct that gets compiled into efficient machine code. I wouldn't want this to be endemic in my codebase or my dependencies.
Enum supports an exhaustive Switch as well, here's an example based on the blog post:
https://go.dev/play/p/Ef78vLyw33g
Is it just me or is the syntax on these worse than the issues itβs solving?