In an industry notorious for jobhopping what leverage do you actually think these well compensated employees have? There's a horde of people willing to replace them if they wish to take an ideological stance and quit.

They can always start their own streaming service.

None, because techies won't unionize.

What? This has nothing to do with unions. If enough engineers don't want to work on $x, Netflix won't be able to work on $x. If there are enough, they'll find replacements for ones that leave and they'll be able to work on it.

The situation would be identical with unions, unless you think engineers who would be fine working on $x would be OK with their union deciding for them that they shouldn't. More likely they just wouldn't be members of that union.

I never understand why people want to inject an often corrupt, additional layer of insane bureaucracy into a work environment where they already have a lot of leverage. Techies don't unionise for very good reasons!

Your argument doesn't match your example? You're saying I should reconsider my ethics until they match with picking up the gun, since the line is made up

Or you can fight for absolute good and justice on a war to unweave entropy itself across the entire multiverse. Your choice.

Do ethics matter or mean anything if we just start changing them to fit the situation?