Look at the case of Atherton, CA - multi-million dollar home values due to city ordinances around minimum lot size and land usage. The land value here is created by scarcity, and driven largely by the success of the greater metro area.

But if you are trying to value this land from a Georgist perspective, and one that takes into account property zoning and use requirements, the land is worth much less than it should be due to the restrictions, and would be taxed lower than parcels of similar size in nearby cities.

This seems, in theory, to reward obstinate enclaves of low-density development within larger metros. The homeowners have no reason to elect a council that would vote against their interests in this respect, and their taxes would stay low.