Re:50% of All Workers Made Less than $26,000 in 2010
by thret on Thursday October 20, 2011 @05:00PM
(#3136972)
The legal minimum wage in Australia is $15.51, about $16 USD. I realise Americans are poor, but I had no idea it was so bad.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:50% of All Workers Made Less than $26,000 in 2010
by yummyfajitas on Thursday October 20, 2011 @05:17PM
(#3137068)
Don't feel bad for us, there are lots of places where things are worse. Australia, for example.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Median_household_income
Adjusting for PPP, your $16 USD is only about $11.40. Australia is considerably more expensive than the US.
Re:50% of All Workers Made Less than $26,000 in 2010
by thret on Friday October 21, 2011 @07:41PM
(#3142220)
Actually Australia has the highest median wealth in the world.
http://au.ibtimes.com/news/234393/20111020/forex/australia-d...
Not sure why you think Australia is more expensive than the US. I visit the US every year and do not find this to be the case at all.
Re:50% of All Workers Made Less than $26,000 in 2010
by getsat on Thursday October 20, 2011 @05:04PM
(#3136986)
Minimum wages vary per state in the USA. States with higher cost of living (e.g., California) typically have higher minimum wages.
Re:50% of All Workers Made Less than $26,000 in 2010
by tsotha on Friday October 21, 2011 @12:09AM
(#3138368)
$16 USD in the US goes a lot further than $16 in Oz. From what I can tell Aussies pay anywhere from 20% to 100% more than Americans for the same products if you do the currency conversion.
Re:50% of All Workers Made Less than $26,000 in 2010
by stonemetal on Thursday October 20, 2011 @05:35PM
(#3137172)
Sorry for being off topic I always find it weird when people use $ for non US currency. After all $ is a U superimposed on an S. Is it a common thing to use that symbol for other currencies, or is it a just easier to type thing.
Re:50% of All Workers Made Less than $26,000 in 2010
by jholman on Thursday October 20, 2011 @07:36PM
(#3137639)
Ten seconds on wikipedia would have shown you that the use of this symbol to denote dollars and pesos predates (if just barely) the founding of the United States.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollar_sign
So, barring time travel, I suggest that your theory about a U superimposed on an S must be wrong (at least as a causal story).
I've got to learn to stop caring about the rampant America-centrism on H.N.