News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Biographer: Jobs refused early and potentially life-savin... by alanfalcon on Thursday October 20, 2011 @04:37PM (#3136860)
I've always wondered about Steve's decision to severely limit stock distribution at Pixar when it had its IPO. What he did was apparently legal, but many staffers there felt like they were treated unfairly. A theory I've been considering is that Steve did it to avoid changing the people who made Pixar what it was[1]. I mean, Steve certainly didn't seem like he cared about having the money, except maybe to say "told you so" to all those who doubted him after his removal from Apple. Just something that seems to fit with the facts that I'm aware of.

[1] Of course, John Lasseter, for one, ended up with a load of money and nobody could argue that he changed. He just went from collecting toy train sets to having actual train sets installed in his backyard.

Re:Biographer: Jobs refused early and potentially life-savin... by gamble on Thursday October 20, 2011 @06:52PM (#3137478)
Didn't he do the same thing during Apple's IPO? I was under the impression that Apple employees only received stock because Woz voluntarily gave up some of his own to form an employee pool.

It's this tight-fisted aspect of Jobs that makes it difficult for me to appreciate him on a non-professional level.

Re:Biographer: Jobs refused early and potentially life-savin... by 0x12 on Thursday October 20, 2011 @05:50PM (#3137240)
When you work with people you could at least respect their right to make their own mistakes and to give them the benefit of the doubt.