Re:Python Language Summit: Python Without the GIL
by throwaway894345 on Thursday May 12, 2022 @10:04AM
(#31354384)
I wasn’t talking about nerfing C-extensions. You can get the same power out of a smaller, well-defined interface that would give the interpreter a lot more leeway for optimization. This optimizations would therefore make native Python packages more feasible, making the ecosystem less dependent on C extensions. Anyway, I don’t think people use Python because of the C-extensions packages (although there are certainly some exceptions e.g., pandas), I think people use C extensions because the native performance is so poor.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Python Language Summit: Python Without the GIL
by pwang on Thursday May 12, 2022 @04:59PM
(#31360070)
Over 50% of Python users report using it for data-related things, e.g. data science, ML, etc. (Jetbrains poll)
That's numpy, pandas, sklearn, and friends.
Re:Python Language Summit: Python Without the GIL
by throwaway894345 on Thursday May 12, 2022 @09:09PM
(#31362052)
Fair enough. I defer to JetBrains on that point.