Re:Misperceptions of the opponent fringe and miscalibration ...
by mistermann on Thursday May 12, 2022 @10:11AM
(#31354477)
> Ok, I will say out loud, it is correct thing to say.
It may be a "correct thing to say" (aka: popular), but this is distinctly different from correct from en epistemology perspective.
> But it was part I 100% agree with.
You are welcome to agree, but I am discussing what is true (and indirectly, the nature of human consciousness, which renders the customized/unique "reality" that each person on this forum experiences, and tends to mistake for reality itself).
I dont think they are silly. I think that they prefer to good relationship with that political branch over telling truth. They think it makes them sound like smart and rational and dont mind throwing others under the bus in the process.
E.g., they have priorities.
> "Fair to say" and "correct/true" are very different things.
Ok, I will say out loud, it is correct thing to say.
> It is supreme court justices that would be banning it, not elected representatives.
Supreme court did not came out of skies. They were put in place by politicians who picked people guaranteed to make political decisions.
> Abortion banning wasn't the only claim.
No. But it was part I 100% agree with.