I disagree with your choice of charity but I support your line of thinking and your choices. The fact that this charity has numbers puts it way ahead of the slush funds that do zero good (or negative good). I personally think that's how EA will go mainstream, by encouraging everyone to make more quantitative decisions that result in more funding to better charities.

This person is also straightforward with their reasoning - yeah sure it's not as effective as malaria nets but it's a personal cause they care about. Most people don't even think about how effective the causes they support are - at all! It's mindblowing.