Innovation is path-dependent, and communication/adoption/organizational/economic constraints are just as real as technical ones. It's like how pretty much any skilled programmer could've built the first version of Facebook in a weekend, but to take off, it needed to start in the highest social-status campus (Harvard) of the most networked population (college students) of early adopters (young people). That limited the pool of entrepreneurs to basically just Mark Zuckerburg and the Winklevii, and Zuckerburg got there first under somewhat dubious circumstances.
Same with a lot of discussions in politics, climate change, renewable energy, and Hacker News. An uninformed layperson looks at the problem as a whole, says "We should do this, let's throw money at it and someone will figure out how", and then we end up with a financial bubble and not a whole lot of solutions.
We talked about Jobs' "reality distortion field" but there's a much much more mundane almost sycophantic hyping up of the future & success that is deeply deeply deeply woven into most company's genes.
When possible, refer all matters to committees, for “further study and consideration.” Attempt to make the committee as large as possible — never less than five.
https://www.openculture.com/2015/12/simple-sabotage-field-ma...
Then we add a step 5 where middle management goes away and gossips about how everything is f*cked.
This. I've learned to completely ignore what companies state their values are and/or these slogans they trot out. Culture isn't a poster you put on the wall.
Step 1: Organization holds endless multi-hour meetings about intractable organizational issues.
Step 2: Stakeholders go to a bar to drink heavily and commissarate.
Step 3: Uninhibited stakeholders decide on a way to ignore the inscrutable organizational issues and Just Do It.
Step 4: Organization pats itself on the back for another successful round of all-day meetings.
Sort of a variation on the classic "beatings will continue until morale improves" strategy.