Re:Why do USB-C hubs still have USB 2.0 ports? (2021)
by jeffbee on Tuesday May 10, 2022 @08:33PM
(#31334462)
"Simple USB-C hub" is very underspecified. Exactly what do you want it to do?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why do USB-C hubs still have USB 2.0 ports? (2021)
by bluGill on Tuesday May 10, 2022 @11:51PM
(#31335665)
Speaking with my usability hat on (my degree is human machine interaction) that isn't a useful question as there is one correct answer: plug whatever devices in, in whatever order and combination.
Re:Why do USB-C hubs still have USB 2.0 ports? (2021)
by jeffbee on Tuesday May 10, 2022 @11:56PM
(#31335679)
OK, you plug a power supply, two laptops, and three monitors into a USB-C hub. What happens?
Any kind of bus where peers can negotiate protocols is going to have severe usability issues. Just look at the MacBook that's plugged into itself: https://photos.app.goo.gl/G2PivEo1JrKKtA9W6
Given the fundamental usability problems of USB-C, I don't think there is anything anyone can do toward making a simple USB-C hub.
Re:Why do USB-C hubs still have USB 2.0 ports? (2021)
by bluGill on Wednesday May 11, 2022 @07:05AM
(#31338229)
> Given the fundamental usability problems of USB-C
That is the whole point.
Re:Why do USB-C hubs still have USB 2.0 ports? (2021)
by kuschku on Wednesday May 11, 2022 @05:28AM
(#31337615)
Okay, so you want a hub that provides 240W per port and supports 40Gbps per port, right?
Are you willing to pay the hundreds of dollars that’s going to cost?
Re:Why do USB-C hubs still have USB 2.0 ports? (2021)
by bluGill on Wednesday May 11, 2022 @07:10AM
(#31338254)
Cost to create a hub should have been a consideration of the spec designers.
I'm involved (on the very edge) of C++ standards, and we often reject proposals because it would be too hard to implement, or too hard to teach. The proposal itself would be a useful, but the costs are too high.