It has to do with the woman's body. But it is not only about the woman's body - the fetus exists also. The problem with the "woman's body" rhetoric is that it deliberately ignores the question of the fetus.

Just as the the pro-life stance ignores the question of the woman. There are the rights of two beings in play here, requiring compromise… something that is nowhere to be found in these discussions.

Compromise is made harder by three things, one is the parasitical relationship that only disadvantages a woman (who doesn’t want a child), the second is that a woman’s body flushing a fetus is a natural occurrence, and third is that occasionally the removal of the fetus, dead or alive, is medically required for the woman to survive.

The bans on abortions being proposed are not compromises.