Re:How to have a billion dollar exit with zero capital gains...
by sokoloff on Tuesday May 10, 2022 @06:13AM
(#31325354)
If you could specify the intent in a way that could be adjudicated, why couldn’t you just write the law better in a different dimension? “This applies only up to $X M/yr” or whatever.
Having someone later come along and try to devine what the “true intent” was and levy punishments for behavior clearly allowed by the law but against an imputed intent sounds worse for society based on laws than the avoidance of some taxes via a poorly written law.
The solution would be to allow punishing breaking the intent of a law, but given how politicized even the justice system is these days, I'm not so sure if that's a good idea either.