Apple Extends Non-Disclosure to App Store Rejection Letters

Re:Apple Extends Non-Disclosure to App Store Rejection Letters by iamelgringo on Wednesday September 24, 2008 @02:07AM (#313225)

No, I appreciate it, I wasn't aware of that. I think that it makes my point even clearer, however. The only reason that Apple doesn't want to allow a VM of OSX to be able to run on top of Linux, BSD, Solaris or Windows is because they want a locked down system. They want to make more money selling the associated hardware. And, while that is certainly a choice they are entitled to make, it speaks fairly loudly to a culture of being closed and locked down.

Even Microsoft is releasing Open Source licensed software these days. Isn't OSX built on top of a Darwin Kernel? Any one know of Open Source releases the Apple has done? It would be nice if they returned the favor to the community.

</rant>

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Extends Non-Disclosure to App Store Rejection Letters by demallien on Wednesday September 24, 2008 @03:10AM (#313263)

Ummm, well, LLVM and Bonjour come to mind, and then there's a little-known project known as WebKit for which Apple is the main sponsor :-).

They also do tons of smaller stuff - as a ruby programmer, I appreciate Apple's sponsorship of the RubyCocoa project, and the fact that they have hired Laurent (the main programmer for RubyCocoa) to develop the next-generation MacRuby implementation, which provides free bridging between ruby and Objective-C

[ Parent | on HN ]