Re:Ask HN: Please review my site "Smoke Signal"
by huhtenberg on Wednesday October 19, 2011 @04:12PM
(#3131843)
Another take on the same problem is to send an automatic reply saying
:)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Please review my site "Smoke Signal"
by simonsarris on Wednesday October 19, 2011 @04:23PM
(#3131886)
If two people both used that automatic reply, and one of them emailed the other, it would result in the world's funniest arms race.
Re:Ask HN: Please review my site "Smoke Signal"
by JoshTriplett on Wednesday October 19, 2011 @04:54PM
(#3132043)
Or ARMMs race: http://catb.org/jargon/html/A/ARMM.html
Re:Ask HN: Please review my site "Smoke Signal"
by kooshball on Wednesday October 19, 2011 @04:43PM
(#3131987)
The big email provides should already have loop detection. This is no different than a vacation email or an NDR.
Re:Ask HN: Please review my site "Smoke Signal"
by gkoberger on Wednesday October 19, 2011 @04:43PM
(#3131983)
If I ever were to get an email from anyone saying that, I guarantee I would never email them again. So incredibly annoying.
Re:Ask HN: Please review my site "Smoke Signal"
by hugh3 on Wednesday October 19, 2011 @09:43PM
(#3133002)
Well then, it may have served its purpose!
Seriously though, there's maybe a dozen ultra-important people in the world for whom I could tolerate a reply like that. But anyone that important really should have their secretary sorting through their email anyway.
A reply like that from someone of lower (or even equal) status would be incredibly rude.
Re:Ask HN: Please review my site "Smoke Signal"
by fastfinner on Wednesday October 19, 2011 @05:37PM
(#3132231)
The problem with this approach is that I would not want to auto-reply to every message, particularly not group lists or important people who expect their stuff to be read on time. I think smokesignal is a lot more subtle.