News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Monsanto’s ghostwriting to influence science and media by harry8 on Sunday May 08, 2022 @11:42PM (#31310356)
Agree or not all you like but I flat out don't believe you don't know what is meant.

1) Doesn't wish to discuss the ethics at all.

2) The working conditions are very good.

Re:Monsanto’s ghostwriting to influence science and media by seattle_spring on Sunday May 08, 2022 @11:49PM (#31310407)
They likely don't want to discuss ethics because the exact same arguments and insults get trotted out everytime. Especially because if his arguments don't align with the common narrative, several people will likely just dismiss him as a "paid shill." Why would anyone willingly wade into that mess with nothing to gain?
Re:Monsanto’s ghostwriting to influence science and media by tptacek on Sunday May 08, 2022 @11:50PM (#31310415)
Yeah, this is what I was getting at.
Re:Monsanto’s ghostwriting to influence science and media by harry8 on Monday May 09, 2022 @12:10AM (#31310528)
Maybe say so plainly rather than faking at playing dumb?

What you're assuming was meant wasn't actually said either. Make your case. Make well. Make it clearly and forcefully but please don't go in for those kind of hollywood-drama-style courtroom argument tricks, it's not helpful to any given discussion.

Re:Monsanto’s ghostwriting to influence science and media by seattle_spring on Monday May 09, 2022 @12:23AM (#31310598)
The intent you're claiming isn't anywhere in the person's posts. All they said was that they didn't want to get into the morality argument in this forum, which is a reasonable position to have given there are people like you chomping at the bit to "prove him wrong" or whatever. Chill out, guy.
Re:Monsanto’s ghostwriting to influence science and media by harry8 on Monday May 09, 2022 @01:03AM (#31310810)
I did not claim any intent.