A military veteran is pretty much anyone who served, doesn’t need to be in times of active conflict.

Source: https://www.va.gov/OSDBU/docs/Determining-Veteran-Status.pdf

In my mind - and in most, I believe - a military veteran means a war veteran.

I was US military for 11 years and can definitely tell you that, beyond the “on paper” definition I posted above, members of the military consider anyone who volunteers for military service and does their time to be a veteran. I’d definitely be interested to know where this concept of “you have to be in a conflict” definition came from. Is it from people who were in the military or just pop culture influenced misconceptions?

> members of the military consider anyone who volunteers for military service and does their time to be a veteran.

If you take the oath, go where you're sent, and do as you're ordered (within the law and morality), that's all that can be asked. Some find themselves having to do it with people shooting at them or trying to blow them up, like my dad and some of my uncles; others are more fortunate, like numerous other family members, including me. All are veterans. (And that goes for draftees too, although it's been 50 years since the U.S. has had a draft.)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2017/10/22...

I'm a not-so-young chap, so a lot of my compatriots are combat veterans (mostly Vietnam, and Iraq 1). They are the ones that have given me that impression.

In any case, my original post had nothing, whatsoever, to with military service, and I think we've just about exhausted this rabbithole.