News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IBM's Asshole Test by SilasX on Thursday May 05, 2022 @01:17PM (#31276068)
>Some discussions are not serious, and are destined not to be really productive anyway. Dating advice falls into that category.

Then you could have said as much from the beginning.

>Is ignoring context like this your idea of being a "helpful contributor to discussions?" Because I don't see who's being helped by this.

You communicated poorly, in being (almost deliberately) unaware of what context others might lack. That error followed a pattern that others often make. I pointed out why it is an error so that you, and those others, can avoid it. And then, in doing so, I got you to reveal context your original comment needed.

Yes, I absolutely feel like I contributed here, and that you made the forum just a little bit worse with your original reply and contempt for discussion quality. Do you see why I might think that?

Re:IBM's Asshole Test by bee_rider on Thursday May 05, 2022 @01:45PM (#31276421)
Interesting! While I disagree with you that I've made the forum worse, this conversation has cause me to reflect on the importance of using low-stakes sarcasm like this, which has refined my internal justification for doing so. So, I guess everyone benefited. Have a good one!
Re:IBM's Asshole Test by SilasX on Saturday May 07, 2022 @08:43PM (#31300159)
I didn’t benefit if you’re going to keep making comments like you did here that hurt the forum for reasons I explained and which make no difference to you.
Re:IBM's Asshole Test by HeyLaughingBoy on Thursday May 05, 2022 @05:08PM (#31278432)
Wow. Upvoted you twice in one subthread. I don't do that often :-)
Re:IBM's Asshole Test by SilasX on Saturday May 07, 2022 @08:44PM (#31300166)
That’s a fact about your poor judgment of HN contributions, not a fact about any helpful insight in bee_rider’s comments.