Re:Rejecting candidates unwilling to acknowledge female inte...
by rrauenza on Thursday May 05, 2022 @12:25PM
(#31275364)
FWIW, later he clarified:
> Spelling it out for the few people in replies wanting to misunderstand what I am saying:
> We rejected candidates who refused to communicate w female interviewers when they asked questions or tried to communicate. They’d only respond to the guy, who did not initiate the comms!
and
> When I wrote "did not make eye contact" I meant "only made eye contact with the man, refused to do so with the woman" reflecting on how the woman was ignored. Not just about eye contact: was about refusing to communicate in any way with the woman: but not the man.
> Spelling it out for the few people in replies wanting to misunderstand what I am saying:
> We rejected candidates who refused to communicate w female interviewers when they asked questions or tried to communicate. They’d only respond to the guy, who did not initiate the comms!
and
> When I wrote "did not make eye contact" I meant "only made eye contact with the man, refused to do so with the woman" reflecting on how the woman was ignored. Not just about eye contact: was about refusing to communicate in any way with the woman: but not the man.