News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IBM's Asshole Test by Ntrails on Thursday May 05, 2022 @06:11AM (#31271510)
> That kind of thing is just gross, is my point.

Observing how people behave around nominal subordinates is not a new trick or one that is gross. It's an interesting data point. This is unusual as rather than a receptionist or security guard, it is someone who doesn't work for the company.

That you think it's impossible to trust someone without formal vetting is really interesting to me. It suggests that formal vetting by Big Corps is useful but knowing someone from a significant number of interactions/conversations is worthless. I don't buy into that at all, I'd argue pretty strongly the inverse is true and vetting is garbage and interpersonal interactions are useful.

Re:IBM's Asshole Test by raverbashing on Thursday May 05, 2022 @11:04AM (#31274287)
Given how people are reacting, sounds like even telling the story is enough to make people out themselves

A similar way is to take the candidate out and see how they deal with the waiter.

Re:IBM's Asshole Test by DarylZero on Thursday May 05, 2022 @09:31AM (#31273072)
It's not impossible to trust someone without formal vetting. It's irresponsible for a bureaucracy to trust someone without accountability.