Re:Stanford gets $1.1B for new climate school from John Doerr
by valarauko on Thursday May 05, 2022 @10:32AM
(#31273842)
> Is this just sarcasm implying that if more people die due to the absence of these agencies, then there will be less of a collective carbon footprint?
Yes - see the parent comment I was replying to.
Re:Stanford gets $1.1B for new climate school from John Doerr
by formerkrogemp on Thursday May 05, 2022 @02:49PM
(#31277095)
Ah, I misunderstood. I apologize.
So, your claim is that if we didn't have the FDA or EPA, then we wouldn't have climate change? I haven't such a ridiculous claim in awhile. What's the logic here? Even disregarding the other Federal agencies that you seem to dislike, how does the end of the Environmental Protection Agency hinder climate change in any capacity whatsoever? Is this just sarcasm implying that if more people die due to the absence of these agencies, then there will be less of a collective carbon footprint?