Re:The Google incentive mismatch: Problems with promotion-or...
by dv_dt on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @01:02PM
(#31263089)
Not google, but I was once given feedback that I wasn't promoted to a management position at a company because I was seen as being too "nice". This was despite 4 years of being a manager at past companies and being perfectly able to solve problems w/o pounding on the table and twisting arms. I left that company soon after. But I see that as an symptom of toxic competitiveness culture too.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Google incentive mismatch: Problems with promotion-or...
by jrochkind1 on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @03:01PM
(#31264482)
I understand doing it accidentally or as a side-effect of hard-to-fix dysfunction, but it boggles my mind that they were fully explicit and self-aware and intentional about creating a process where you couldn't succeed without being an asshole. What a terrible place!
Re:The Google incentive mismatch: Problems with promotion-or...
by waterhouse on Thursday May 05, 2022 @04:41PM
(#31278149)
To give a maximally charitable interpretation, "nice" could be a euphemism for "doormat/not assertive/not raising objections when one should". Though "being perfectly able to solve problems w/o pounding on the table and twisting arms" is evidence against this. (Though conceivably those giving feedback hadn't noticed that evidence; I have no knowledge here.) Also, it would be ironic if they were "nice" enough to use a euphemism that obscured their point completely.