News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Goldman Sachs loses $428 million in third quarter by squishi on Tuesday October 18, 2011 @01:24PM (#3126076)
1. When banks loose money they shouldn't get bailed out. 2. The Bonuses come from bailout money. 3. If the banks want bailout money they should work as civil-servants(and get an average salary) and not pretend that they are winners(like traders or hedge funds - who get no bailouts, when they loose they really loose). Bankers lost money, and caused a major financial crisis so they should Loose their bonuses!

We have no capitalism right now. we have Lemon socialism.

Re:Goldman Sachs loses $428 million in third quarter by cims on Tuesday October 18, 2011 @02:03PM (#3126282)
I do understand this sentiment, to an extent. The reality is that all the banks participate in the same job market and need to compete to attract and retain talent. If a bank (regardless of bail-out status) does not compensate employees competitively, it will fail to attract and retain the necessary talent and as such fail to perform. The only way a bank could still succeed without paying bonuses is if all banks did the same thing. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
Re:Goldman Sachs loses $428 million in third quarter by smashing on Tuesday October 18, 2011 @04:26PM (#3126981)
If this were a game, what sport would it be? Last I checked, gambling, and lets be honest, that's what this is, isn't a sport.
Re:Goldman Sachs loses $428 million in third quarter by gnaritas on Tuesday October 18, 2011 @03:11PM (#3126632)
> Don't hate the player, hate the game.

Or hate anyone who repeats this meme.

Re:Goldman Sachs loses $428 million in third quarter by endtime on Tuesday October 18, 2011 @05:48PM (#3127374)
> 2. The Bonuses come from bailout money.

GS has paid back their loan, with interest.

Re:Goldman Sachs loses $428 million in third quarter by sp332 on Tuesday October 18, 2011 @03:48PM (#3126808)
I heard that from AIG, but I don't remember hearing that about GS?