Will Hare replace C? Or Rust? Or Zig? Or anything else?

Re:Will Hare replace C? Or Rust? Or Zig? Or anything else? by linkdd on Tuesday May 03, 2022 @09:19AM (#31247916)

I assume the closed source dependency is distributed as a .a/.so/.dll file, then you can use bindgen[0].

Still, yes it's a bit more complicated. But can we not pretend that the non-existent toolchain in C/C++ is easier in 99% of use cases?

[0] - https://medium.com/dwelo-r-d/using-c-libraries-in-rust-13961...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Will Hare replace C? Or Rust? Or Zig? Or anything else? by snovv_crash on Tuesday May 03, 2022 @09:50AM (#31248279)

No, I want a closed source Rust dependency. Otherwise it's going through a C API and I lose all of the benefits of using Rust.

Once you solve this problem, C++ & CMake are of similar complexity for C++ dependencies.

Otherwise to compare C++ toolchains, if it's distributed as a .a file, just adding -l/path/to/libclosed.a works for C++, can't get more simple than that. Or one line in the CMake file with basically the same thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Will Hare replace C? Or Rust? Or Zig? Or anything else? by linkdd on Tuesday May 03, 2022 @10:00AM (#31248413)

A .rlib file then, that you can then add with:

  RUSTFLAGS="--extern closedlib=path/to/libclosedlib.rlib"

[ Parent | on HN ]