Re:SF Conservancy now accepting copyright assignment for any...
by onphonenow on Tuesday May 03, 2022 @02:16PM
(#31251573)
The issue is the legal system has, to date, largely followed the understood intent of the GPLv2.
Consulting with the SFC does nothing to advance anything.
Harald Welte has had great success getting folks to release source code. However, he does not threaten commercial use of GPL software, no unlock keys / signing keys etc are needed.
I have no clue whether whatever SFC has been claiming about the legal status of GPL is true or not (quite frankly, I haven't bothered even looking at what they're saying). But if the legal system's interpretation of GPLv2 doesn't match what most authors want or agree to, that sounds like precisely the kind of thing authors should want a lawyer to tell them, so they have a chance to switch to a different license.