Re:A first for Canada: New type of nuclear plant opening by ...
by natmaka on Tuesday May 03, 2022 @02:00AM
(#31245167)
There are rules (releasing water...) and equipment aiming at reducing harm to aquatic life, even worst cases (migratory fishes). https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/habitat-conservation...
"the rate of emissions per unit of electric generation from hydropower (excluding tropical reservoirs) is much lower than for fossil fuel technologies." Source: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1209/ML12090A850.pdf
Re:A first for Canada: New type of nuclear plant opening by ...
by arcticbull on Tuesday May 03, 2022 @04:35AM
(#31246032)
This is the study I was referring to re: GHG impact. It depends where and most importantly how long you run the plant. [1]
I'm not really opposed to hydro, I only responded because the impact of the creation of reservoirs is likely not factored into the headline numbers.
Re:A first for Canada: New type of nuclear plant opening by ...
by powcontech on Tuesday May 03, 2022 @02:20AM
(#31245290)
Do you have a source hydro turbines “turning fish in to mulch”? I’ve been around lots of hydro projects and the main hazards for fish seemed to be either dewatering of habitat due to turbines reducing flows too quickly or I heard it is bad for them if the dam uses the spill way and makes the water all aerated
Re:A first for Canada: New type of nuclear plant opening by ...
by arcticbull on Tuesday May 03, 2022 @04:30AM
(#31246006)
I was being a bit glib there, I just meant that it was bad for the fish. My understanding is the average mortality rate for fish passing through a dam is 1 in 5. [1]
[1] https://ec.europa.eu/research-and-innovation/en/horizon-maga...
I trust StatsCan though, so your point is well made.
[1] https://blogs.edf.org/energyexchange/2019/11/15/long-conside...